I read the “Radical But Right” which was written by Sarah Wells from the Arak Anthology, the author tells us the question of animals rights and asserts that animals should be protected from human harm.
The author claims there are not enough ways to protect animals from cruelty slaughtering and people should no longer kill or abuse animals. And the writer uses adequate reasons to support her claim. First, she indicates us that animals exhibit so many redeeming characteristics, such as intelligence, compassion so that they have the right to live. In addition, she tells us that animals can feel pain and they have interests so that they should have rights. Third, there is no specific physiological need for people to consuming animals, and it is also good for people’s health and without consuming animals can keep them away from certain diseases.
The writer use a barbeque as an example happens in our daily life and several science evidence and experiments to support her claim. As I think, the essay is very persuasive not only because it uses a lot of examples to support its claim but also because she uses lots of quotations which strongly support her idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment